🐸 This guide will help user to test their font locally to confirm quality-assurance. We recommend to test your font on the latest stable version of your OS and apps.
Bear in mind:
You can use virtual machines to test your fonts into different environments (practical for testing on older machine and therefore ensure backward compatibility).
Installing consecutively different versions of a font family will lead to cache issues. So don’t forget to remove any remaining version of the font, restart the app, open the font menu and quit the app before installing any other version of the font. You may even need to clean the caches and then restart your computer. Another trick would be to append some kind of version number suffix to the family name until final version.
If you plan on having both .otf and .ttf fonts on the same machine, we recommend you use a different name (specifically name ID 1, 4 and 6) to avoid any potential conflict.
No conflict during installation (in user fonts folder: user/Library/Fonts).
Fonts appear in Font Book.
Fonts looks good in Font Book.
Family names and style manes are displayed correctly.
Usage in external office apps
MS Word, Powerpoint, LibreOffice Writer, LibreOffice Impress…
Fonts are grouped in menu by family name and all instances appear in weight order.
If VF, at least 1 instance appears in dropdown menu (font origin), but since late 2021 version of MS Office (Mac OS 11.*) all of them should appear.
Style linking works properly (bold and italic button or regular, italic button for all other cuts)
In MS Word, when style linking is absent or not working properly, you will see a fake bold or fake italic, watch carefully for that
Fonts are displayed correctly
Kerning works (just display a few kerning pairs to see if it works)
In MS Word, kerning is applied to the text as an option, it is not a parameter that you activate for all your documents. Find it in the advanced parameters of Fonts settings: you have to check the box and specify a minimum text size to apply kerning (5pt for Mac, and 8pt for Windows)
Glyphs having special interpolation (rvrn or special layers) are displaying as expected
All styles appear in weight order in dropdown menu
Instances are accessible through dropdown menu
Instances are displayed correctly
Sliders work properly (try from an upright instance and then with an italic instance)
No unexpected behavior during variation
Spacing and kerning work properly when using the sliders
All OpenType Features work properly (activation from menu or style)
Stylistic sets have names
Variable Fonts
Composites and glyphs using brace/bracket layers have the same kerning and spacing as base-glyph
Style linking is working in Adobe Mac apps (shift+cmd+b / shift+cmd+i)
Usage in native apps
TextEdit / Pages…
Font appear in font dropdown menu, all styles appear in style dropdown menu; default style is first on the list and then in weight order.
Style linking works properly (cmd+b, cmd+i)
Fonts are displayed correctly
Remember to remove fonts from the user fonts folder at the end of testing.
Microsoft Windows
Installation
No conflict during installation
Fonts appear in C:/Windows/Fonts folder
Double-click on each style and check if:
Outline type is correct (PS for .otf, TT for .ttf)
Font is displayed correctly (small size in waterfall)
This is actually a good way to quickly check out your hinting.
Usage in Office apps
MS Word, Powerpoint, LibreOffice Writer, LibreOffice Impress…
Upright fonts appear in alphabetical order in dropdown menu (except for Bold and Italic instances that are activated only the B and I buttons)
If VF, at least 1 instance appears in dropdown menu (font origin), but since 2022 version of MS Office (Windows 11) all of them should appear.
Style linking works properly (bold and italic button or regular, italic button for all other cuts)
In MS Word, when style linking is absent or not working properly, you will see a fake bold or fake italic, watch carefully for that
Fonts are displayed correctly
Kerning works (just display few kerning pairs to see if it works)
In MS Word, kerning is applied to the text as an option, it is not a parameter that you activate for all your documents. Find it in the advanced parameters of Fonts settings: you have to check the box and specify a minimum text size to apply kerning (5pt for Mac, and 8pt for Windows)
Glyphs having special interpolation (rvrn or special layers) are displaying as expected
Letters with components work
Combining characters (ligatures, conjuncts) work
Web Browsers
Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge…
All web formats
Fonts are display correctly
Fonts have kerning
Linespacing looks okay (not too lose, not too tight)
No clipping
Variable Fonts
Samsa displays all instances with propers names in the STAT sidebar section. Regular and other default names are Elided (in parenthesis), and there is style linking between Regular and Bold (400 → 700), and between Roman and Italic (0 → 1)
AVAR table display the expected result (linear or not)
FVAR table has the instances you want with proper name and proper coordinates (only weight instances with coordinates every 100 for GF)
Variation works properly (also glyphs with special layers)
Kerning too
Compatibility
If your fonts of different formats have the same naming, you will have to test formats one by one, restarting the computer between each to avoid cache issues and conflicts. If they have a different naming system, eg. NameCFF.otf, NameTT.ttf, NameVF.ttf, test their compatibility when installed on the same machine.
No conflicts during installation
All fonts are displayed in the fonts folder with their respective naming
They can all be used in the same document, in whatever software, with no trouble
TrueType Hinting
Manual hinting is often applied from 8ppm to 21ppm. Overshoot suppression until 48-51ppm.
How to prepare hinted rendering to review:
Install gftools-qa and look at the image-waterfall output of diffbrowser.
Use gftools gen-html and upload 2 versions of generated fonts (hinted and unhinted) to look at if the font is better with or without hinting.
What to check:
All glyphs are well aligned: if you see your /r higher than other letter, it is probably because top point is out of the blue zone. So checks where your guidelines normally are (baseline, x-height, caps-height, ascenders, descenders)
Superior and inferiors figures are well aligned too with each other.
No overshoot until 48ppm
Glyphs are aligned also between styles (bold is not higher than Regular at the same ppm size)
All glyphs of the same set look consistent (there is no glyph better or worse than the other)
Letters are readable
Weight is equally distributed (horizontally and vertically) in symmetrical letters (o, e, g, c)
Spacing is not messed up
Accents don’t clash with letters
Counter-shapes are not collapsed (e, g, ring)
Upright and italic of the same weight have a consistent weight
Dots on i and j are aligned
Useful Links
**Testing web pages:**
- [Wakamai Fondue](https://wakamaifondue.com/)
- [FontDrop](https://fontdrop.info/)
- [Impallari Testing Pages](http://www.rosaliewagner.com/font-testing/index.php)
- [Axis-Praxis](https://www.axis-praxis.org/specimens/__DEFAULT__) and [Samsa](https://www.axis-praxis.org/samsa/)
- [Dinamo Font Gautlet](https://dinamodarkroom.com/gauntlet/)
- [Type Network’s Tools](https://typetools.typenetwork.com)
- [Idiot Proof](https://idiotproofed.com/)
- [Monotype’s interactive font specimen](https://www.fontspecimen.com/)
- [FontGoggles](https://fontgoggles.org/)
**Testing apps:**
- [DTL OT Master](https://www.fontmaster.nl/index.php/otmaster/)
- [Font table viewer](https://glyphsapp.com/tools/fonttableviewer)
- [Fontproof](https://github.com/silnrsi/fontproof) (still in development)